• Thu. Oct 6th, 2022

Paperwork reveal legislation agency that ‘oversaw’ TSM Reginald case defended the corporate in one other case concurrently


Jul 2, 2022

The identical legislation agency that was used to “advise and oversee” the latest investigations into TSM co-owner Andy “Reginald” Dinh was concurrently serving to to defend TSM in a special case, according to The Jacob Wolf Report.

Paperwork obtained by Jacob Wolf detailed that whereas lawyer Matthew Marca and his agency, Gutierrez Marca, have been serving to coordinate the investigation into Reginald, the agency was additionally actively defending TSM’s mother or father firm Swift in a case that alleged the corporate had wrongfully terminated the contract of former Blitz advertising and marketing supervisor John Nguyen. When talking to Wolf, a spokesperson for Marca defined that his work on this case didn’t impression the continuing investigation into Reginald.

See also  Mirage, Inferno, and Mud 2 amongst hottest CS:GO maps in matchmaking this 12 months

Nguyen’s lawsuit stemmed from alleged marijuana utilization within the office by Blitz advertising and marketing director Nick Ward. Nguyen claimed he skilled extreme anxiousness because of Ward’s alleged drug utilization, and filed a criticism with Blitz HR. The complaint particulars that after Nguyen approached human assets supervisor Anna Kim to report Ward, he was informed “one week later” that he had been fired from the corporate for allegations of sexual harassment. In response to Nguyen’s lawyer, he had by no means been questioned by anybody at Blitz concerning any such actions, and that no steps have been ever taken to stick to Nguyen’s rights beneath California’s Honest Employment and Housing Act.

See also  Evil Geniuses stroll to victory over Dignitas, lock up first-round LCS Championship bye

Marca, who defended Swift on this case, defined in his response that the corporate “didn’t discriminate or retaliate in opposition to [Nguyen], however quite acted lawfully and for respectable enterprise causes.” 

Marca led his protection of TSM on this case whereas concurrently being concerned within the investigation into intensive complaints concerning Reginald. He helped to compile a report posted to Reginald’s Twitter account the place it was written that “the investigator discovered no proof of any illegal habits on the a part of the corporate, its executives, or by [Reginald] personally.”

On this report, Marca claimed that his legislation agency’s position was to “advise and oversee” the investigations into Reginald. A spokesperson for Marca and Swift later informed Wolf that neither Marca nor his legislation agency offered “oversight” for the investigation, however that it particularly helped coordinate communications between Swift, its human assets division, the unbiased agency conducting the investigation, and ultimately Riot after the investigation was full.

See also  Tankplank reigns supreme: T1 bounces again with dominant 25-minute victory in opposition to Evil Geniuses at MSI 2022

Replace July 1 9:20pm CT: An earlier model of this text said {that a} spokesperson for Gutierrez Marca spoke to Jacob Wolf. The spokesperson in query really represented Matthew Marca, in addition to Swift, and never the Gutierrez Marca legislation agency. This text has been up to date to appropriate this error.


Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.